{"content":{"sharePage":{"page":0,"digests":[{"id":"25250103","dateCreated":"1276753500","smartDate":"Jun 16, 2010","userCreated":{"username":"theresa.mayfield","url":"https:\/\/www.wikispaces.com\/user\/view\/theresa.mayfield","imageUrl":"https:\/\/ssl.wikicdn.com\/i\/user_none_lg.jpg"},"monitored":false,"locked":false,"links":{"self":"https:\/\/group-a-educ2004.wikispaces.com\/share\/view\/25250103"},"dateDigested":1532390448,"startDate":null,"sharedType":"discussion","title":"Theresa Research Questions","description":"<br \/>\nMy main question would be:<br \/>\n<br \/>\nHow does the reliability of Wikipedia compare with the reliability of traditionally accepted scholastic research sources?<br \/>\n<br \/>\nI think a few guiding questions would be:<br \/>\n1. How reliable is Wikipedia as a source - are there any statistical studies to substantiate this?<br \/>\n2. What are some other acceptable scholastic research sources, and what are their reliability statistics like?<br \/>\n3. How do the two sets of reliability data stack up against each other?<br \/>\n<br \/>\nand maybe a bigger question to be answered (not sure about this one yet...)<br \/>\n4. What is an acceptable reliability percentage? (This is a really loaded question depending on the topic and risk-related nature of the research. Researching how to make play-doh and how to do heart surgery would have different risk factors were the research results applied.)","replyPages":[{"page":0,"digests":[],"more":0}]}],"more":false},"comments":[]},"http":{"code":200,"status":"OK"},"redirectUrl":null,"javascript":null,"notices":{"warning":[],"error":[],"info":[],"success":[]}}